Why are mass hunter area counts a factor of 10 lower then when computed in chemstation?

I just upgraded from chemstation data handling to mass hunter.  I'm noticiing that the areas are much lower.  Allmost exactly by a factor of 10.

This will depend on the type of integrator used withing mass hunter.  The default integrator scales the data by a factor of 10, so this is by design.  There is no loss of accuracy and there are no problems associated with this scaling.  You can pick a different integrator in mass hunter qual or quant so that the areas are identical.